Try it
Forensic Medicine · Asphyxial deaths: drowning
Sample itemWhat is the most appropriate forensic conclusion when froth is found at the mouth and nostrils of a body recovered from water?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
B. It is supportive but not diagnostic of drowning by itself
No single postmortem finding proves drowning. Froth can support the diagnosis but must be interpreted with autopsy findings, toxicology, scene evidence, and exclusion of alternatives.
Option by option
A. It proves poisoning
Froth is not specific for poisoning.
B. It is supportive but not diagnostic of drowning by itself (correct)
Correct. Drowning is a diagnosis based on the totality of evidence.
C. It proves drowning beyond doubt
Single signs are not conclusive.
D. It excludes natural disease
Natural disease may contribute to or precede water immersion.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Forensic Medicine questions
- ThanatologyInstantaneous muscle stiffening at the moment of death that fixes the last act, for exam…
- ToxicologyTransverse white lines on the nails (Mees' lines) are a feature of chronic poisoning with:
- Forensic serologyThe acid phosphatase test in a forensic laboratory is used to detect:
- InjuriesA wound caused by blunt force that has irregular margins with bridging strands of tissue…