Try it
Pharmacology · Neuromuscular blockers: sugammadex
Sample itemAfter a rocuronium-based anaesthetic, the anaesthetist reverses the block with sugammadex. Why is an antimuscarinic drug not needed along with it, unlike with neostigmine?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
A. It encapsulates the steroidal blocker and does not inhibit acetylcholinesterase
Sugammadex is a modified cyclodextrin that forms a tight 1:1 complex with rocuronium (and vecuronium), removing it from the neuromuscular junction. Because it does not inhibit acetylcholinesterase, there is no muscarinic stimulation and so no need for atropine or glycopyrrolate. Neostigmine, in contrast, causes bradycardia and secretions.
Option by option
A. It encapsulates the steroidal blocker and does not inhibit acetylcholinesterase (correct)
Correct. Encapsulation of the blocker leaves acetylcholine metabolism untouched.
B. It blocks muscarinic receptors itself
Sugammadex has no receptor action of its own.
C. It increases acetylcholine release from motor nerve endings
It does not alter transmitter release; the reversal comes from binding the drug.
D. It is a competitive antagonist at the nicotinic end-plate receptor
Nicotinic antagonism would produce neuromuscular block rather than reversing it.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Pharmacology questions
- Emergency drugsA patient develops stridor, wheeze and hypotension minutes after an injection. What is t…
- AntiepilepticsWhat is the preferred first-line drug for a patient in generalised convulsive status epi…
- AntimicrobialsWhich drug can cause a disulfiram-like reaction when taken with alcohol?
- AntiepilepticsWhich drug is preferred for uncomplicated childhood absence seizures?