Try it
ENT · Ear and audiology: superior canal dehiscence work-up
Sample itemA 40-year-old has vertigo triggered by loud sounds and straining, autophony, and a conductive hearing loss with a normal tympanic membrane. Tympanometry is normal and acoustic reflexes are present. Which investigation best confirms the diagnosis?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
D. High-resolution temporal bone CT with reformats along the superior canal
A conductive loss despite normal tympanometry and present acoustic reflexes means the air-bone gap is not from the ossicles; a third mobile window from a dehiscent superior canal is the cause. High-resolution thin-slice CT with reformats in the plane of the canal shows the bony defect. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials show a low threshold.
Option by option
A. Plain radiograph of the mastoid in Schuller view
A Schuller view cannot show a thin bony defect of the canal roof.
B. Contrast MRI of the internal auditory canal
Contrast MRI of the internal auditory canal looks for a vestibular schwannoma, which does not give sound-induced vertigo.
C. CT venography of the sigmoid sinus
Venography would assess a venous sinus problem such as pulsatile tinnitus, not this picture.
D. High-resolution temporal bone CT with reformats along the superior canal (correct)
Correct. Thin-slice CT in the plane of the canal demonstrates the dehiscence.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More ENT questions
- AudiologyIn a tuning fork test, Rinne is negative (bone conduction louder than air conduction) in…
- EarWhich type of chronic suppurative otitis media is considered 'unsafe'?
- LarynxIn singers, vocal nodules typically occur at:
- Vestibular disordersA patient has recurrent attacks of vertigo lasting hours, with fluctuating low-frequency…