Try it
Radiology · Neuroimaging: perfusion mismatch in stroke
Sample itemA patient with a large vessel occlusion presents 9 hours after symptom onset. Perfusion imaging shows a small infarct core and a much larger region of hypoperfused but viable tissue. How is this interpreted?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
D. A salvageable penumbra, supporting mechanical thrombectomy
A mismatch between a small core on diffusion or CBV and a larger hypoperfused area on perfusion imaging defines the penumbra at risk. Selected patients may benefit from thrombectomy in an extended window. A large core with little mismatch shows little tissue to save.
Option by option
A. A venous infarct requiring anticoagulation only
Nothing in the stem suggests a venous cause.
B. A completed infarct, so reperfusion is futile
A small core with a large mismatch is the opposite of a completed infarct.
C. Vasogenic oedema needing steroids
Steroids do not treat ischaemic penumbra.
D. A salvageable penumbra, supporting mechanical thrombectomy (correct)
Correct. Mismatch indicates salvageable tissue.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Radiology questions
- NeuroimagingWhat is the first investigation of choice in suspected acute subarachnoid haemorrhage?
- Cardiac imagingA 'boot-shaped' heart (coeur en sabot) on a chest radiograph is typical of:
- Musculoskeletal imagingA 'bamboo spine' on a plain radiograph is characteristic of:
- Paediatric radiologyThe 'double bubble' sign on an abdominal radiograph of a newborn suggests: