Try it
Radiology · Radiotherapy: skin sparing with megavoltage photons
Sample itemWhy do patients treated with cobalt-60 or linear accelerator photons show less severe skin reactions than those treated with orthovoltage X-rays?
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
B. Maximum dose is deposited at a depth below the skin surface, the build-up effect
With megavoltage photons, secondary electrons build up over a short distance, so the dose maximum lies beneath the skin. Orthovoltage beams give maximum dose at the surface. Bolus is used when the skin must be treated deliberately.
Option by option
A. The beam is fully absorbed by the surface layer
The surface is not the site of full absorption.
B. Maximum dose is deposited at a depth below the skin surface, the build-up effect (correct)
Correct. The dose peak lies below the skin because of electron build-up.
C. The dose rate is much lower
Dose rate is unrelated to the skin sparing effect.
D. Megavoltage beams do not interact with skin
Megavoltage photons do interact with skin but deposit less dose there.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Radiology questions
- NeuroimagingWhat is the first investigation of choice in suspected acute subarachnoid haemorrhage?
- Cardiac imagingA 'boot-shaped' heart (coeur en sabot) on a chest radiograph is typical of:
- Musculoskeletal imagingA 'bamboo spine' on a plain radiograph is characteristic of:
- Paediatric radiologyThe 'double bubble' sign on an abdominal radiograph of a newborn suggests: