Try it
Psychiatry · Forensic psychiatry: legal insanity
Sample itemIn Indian law, the defence of unsoundness of mind (formerly Section 84 IPC, now Section 22 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) applies when, at the time of the act, the person because of unsoundness of mind was incapable of:
Original practice item, not a recalled exam question. Nothing here is recorded.
The answer and the reasoning
B. Knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law
The test, derived from the M'Naghten rules, is cognitive: the accused did not know the nature of the act, or that it was wrong or contrary to law. Irresistible impulse and later amnesia are not accepted as defences by themselves.
Option by option
A. Remembering the act afterwards
Later amnesia does not establish insanity.
B. Knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law (correct)
Correct. The test is cognitive incapacity at the time of the act.
C. Paying for legal representation
Legal representation is unrelated.
D. Controlling any urge, with full knowledge of wrongfulness
Irresistible impulse with knowledge of wrongfulness is not accepted.
Source note: Original NextPrep sample item — pending expert review. This item is original practice material awaiting independent expert review, so confirm important facts in a standard textbook.
More Psychiatry questions
- PsychopharmacologyLithium use during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with which congenital…
- Psychotic disordersWhich of the following is a Schneiderian first-rank symptom of schizophrenia?
- Organic psychiatryAn elderly patient on a surgical ward develops acute confusion that fluctuates through t…
- Eating disordersA 17-year-old girl has a BMI of 15, amenorrhoea, lanugo hair, bradycardia and an intense…